<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Directory Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com</link>
	<description>Interviews, and news from the front line ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:27:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Movement in the supplemental experiment. by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/supplemental-test/movement-in-the-supplemental-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-7774</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/supplemental-test/movement-in-the-supplemental-experiment/#comment-7774</guid>
		<description>Hi Rainchild,

the objective is to play around some with the inbound links of a direcory i have and see what affect it has on the supplemental indexed pages number.

At present it floats around the 12 to 50 odd none supplemental pages.

So at first I am going to use this blog as the sole source of new links, to see if that on its own is enough to get pages out of the sups index.

Of course there are a load of questions left unanswered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rainchild,</p>
<p>the objective is to play around some with the inbound links of a direcory i have and see what affect it has on the supplemental indexed pages number.</p>
<p>At present it floats around the 12 to 50 odd none supplemental pages.</p>
<p>So at first I am going to use this blog as the sole source of new links, to see if that on its own is enough to get pages out of the sups index.</p>
<p>Of course there are a load of questions left unanswered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Movement in the supplemental experiment. by rainchild</title>
		<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/supplemental-test/movement-in-the-supplemental-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator>rainchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 04:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/supplemental-test/movement-in-the-supplemental-experiment/#comment-3508</guid>
		<description>Patrick confirm your obective is to see whether links to internal pages clear the supplementary listing? ....deep links from a single source clear the suplementary listings?....links from a blog...???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick confirm your obective is to see whether links to internal pages clear the supplementary listing? &#8230;.deep links from a single source clear the suplementary listings?&#8230;.links from a blog&#8230;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Update in the info vilesilencer directory list by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/news/new-update-in-the-info-vilesilencer-directory-list/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/news/new-update-in-the-info-vilesilencer-directory-list/#comment-343</guid>
		<description>This is actually very good news for anyone with a directory in that list. I believe all 500 odd directories in this list just became more valuable due to the limited nature of new entres....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually very good news for anyone with a directory in that list. I believe all 500 odd directories in this list just became more valuable due to the limited nature of new entres&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is it really a seo friendly directory? by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/is-it-really-a-seo-friendly-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/is-it-really-a-seo-friendly-directory/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>I think the key to a seo friendly directory is the link back it gives.

So everything related to improving the quality of that link back is the way to measure if a directory is seo friendly or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the key to a seo friendly directory is the link back it gives.</p>
<p>So everything related to improving the quality of that link back is the way to measure if a directory is seo friendly or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is it really a seo friendly directory? by michele</title>
		<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/is-it-really-a-seo-friendly-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/is-it-really-a-seo-friendly-directory/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Apart from the items you&#039;ve mentioned above:

- session ids
- bad URL structure
- lack of basic onsite SEO

If the directory itself isn&#039;t search engine friendly it doesn&#039;t matter a damn how many direct links it could give you - nobody will be able to find it and them

Michele</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apart from the items you&#8217;ve mentioned above:</p>
<p>- session ids<br />
- bad URL structure<br />
- lack of basic onsite SEO</p>
<p>If the directory itself isn&#8217;t search engine friendly it doesn&#8217;t matter a damn how many direct links it could give you &#8211; nobody will be able to find it and them</p>
<p>Michele</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEO Friendly Directories: what are they? by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/seo-friendly-directories-what-are-they/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/seo-friendly-directories-what-are-they/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I always consider a published editorial guideline as a sign of quality.

And if that guideline is actually scritely followed by the editorial team then generally thats a good directory to get submitted to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always consider a published editorial guideline as a sign of quality.</p>
<p>And if that guideline is actually scritely followed by the editorial team then generally thats a good directory to get submitted to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Directory submission benefits by Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/directory-submission-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/directory-submission-benefits/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Sorry about that.

This was an unintentional omission on my part. When referring to High Ranking websites in this instance, I was explicitly speaking in regards to Google Page Rank.

Maybe straying a bit from the topic, maybe not - I don&#039;t necessarily think that a website with a Page Rank of 6 dealing with realty (as per your example) that is lower in the serps (search engine results pages) would necessarily be less relevant than a website with a Page Rank of 2 that ranks higher in the serps for a keyword or phrase.

Personally, I would seek out to get a link in the directory with a Page Rank of 6, even though it had a lower ranking in the search results due to the weight it could send me in regards to Page Rank.

Maybe that answers that, or maybe I didn&#039;t understand your posting correctly.

Though, it is nice to be *aboard*!

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that.</p>
<p>This was an unintentional omission on my part. When referring to High Ranking websites in this instance, I was explicitly speaking in regards to Google Page Rank.</p>
<p>Maybe straying a bit from the topic, maybe not &#8211; I don&#8217;t necessarily think that a website with a Page Rank of 6 dealing with realty (as per your example) that is lower in the serps (search engine results pages) would necessarily be less relevant than a website with a Page Rank of 2 that ranks higher in the serps for a keyword or phrase.</p>
<p>Personally, I would seek out to get a link in the directory with a Page Rank of 6, even though it had a lower ranking in the search results due to the weight it could send me in regards to Page Rank.</p>
<p>Maybe that answers that, or maybe I didn&#8217;t understand your posting correctly.</p>
<p>Though, it is nice to be *aboard*!</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Directory submission benefits by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/directory-submission-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/directory-submission-benefits/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>First of, congratulation Rob on your first post here at the directory blog. Welcome aboard.

Good read, but I would say that there is one BIG question left in the air!

What is a high ranking directory?

I see lots of directory owners fighting it out for top rankings for the search terms related to web directories, but what good will that do to a realtor site that is looking for a listing? I get the feeling that trust rank, that indefinable creacion of GoogleÂ´s has more relevancy than high ranking for web directory search terms.

just my 2 cents of a euros worth .. :)

Regards
Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of, congratulation Rob on your first post here at the directory blog. Welcome aboard.</p>
<p>Good read, but I would say that there is one BIG question left in the air!</p>
<p>What is a high ranking directory?</p>
<p>I see lots of directory owners fighting it out for top rankings for the search terms related to web directories, but what good will that do to a realtor site that is looking for a listing? I get the feeling that trust rank, that indefinable creacion of GoogleÂ´s has more relevancy than high ranking for web directory search terms.</p>
<p>just my 2 cents of a euros worth .. <img src='http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regards<br />
Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Directories are just link farms â€¦ and should be banned from the search engines. by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/directories-are-just-link-farms-%e2%80%a6-and-should-be-banned-from-the-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/my-opinion/directories-are-just-link-farms-%e2%80%a6-and-should-be-banned-from-the-search-engines/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hoping to see some comments ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoping to see some comments &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3000 directories, probably the worlds largest directory list. by www.techtagg.com - See Tech Taggers view on this story!</title>
		<link>http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/lists/3000-directories-probably-the-worlds-largest-directory-list/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>www.techtagg.com - See Tech Taggers view on this story!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedirectoryblog.com/lists/3000-directories-probably-the-worlds-largest-directory-list/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;3000 directory list published...&lt;/strong&gt;

Someone has published a list of 3000 directories. Ordered by PR. This slinks to the blog entry covering that news....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>3000 directory list published&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Someone has published a list of 3000 directories. Ordered by PR. This slinks to the blog entry covering that news&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
